Search

Search

Papers, wiki, Option Blackboard, encyclopedia, and cards.

Results for “automation” · papers 18 · wiki 1
Academic Papers · 18arXiv q-fin live 18 · desk corpus 0
arXiv · arXiv q-fin · 2022

Deep Reinforcement Learning Approach for Trading Automation in The Stock Market

Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) algorithms can scale to previously intractable problems. The automation of profit generation in the stock market is possible using DRL, by combining the financial assets price "prediction" step and the "allocation" step of the portfolio in one unified process to produce fully autonomous systems capable of interacting with their environment to make optimal decisions through trial and

Taylan Kabbani, Ekrem Duman
arXiv · arXiv q-fin · 2025

Optimal Fees for Liquidity Provision in Automated Market Makers

Passive liquidity providers (LPs) in automated market makers (AMMs) face losses due to adverse selection (LVR), which static trading fees often fail to offset in practice. We study the key determinants of LP profitability in a dynamic reduced-form model where an AMM operates in parallel with a centralized exchange (CEX), traders route their orders optimally to the venue offering the better price, and arbitrageurs exp

Steven Campbell, Philippe Bergault, Jason Milionis, Marcel Nutz
arXiv · arXiv q-fin · 2025

Optimal Exit Time for Liquidity Providers in Automated Market Makers

We study the problem of optimal liquidity withdrawal for a representative liquidity provider (LP) in an automated market maker (AMM). LPs earn fees from trading activity but are exposed to impermanent loss (IL) due to price fluctuations. While existing work has focused on static provision and exogenous exit strategies, we characterise the optimal exit time as the solution to a stochastic control problem with an endog

Philippe Bergault, Sébastien Bieber, Leandro Sánchez-Betancourt
arXiv · arXiv q-fin · 2025

Automated Market Makers: Toward More Profitable Liquidity Provisioning Strategies

To trade tokens in cryptoeconomic systems, automated market makers (AMMs) typically rely on liquidity providers (LPs) that deposit tokens in exchange for rewards. To profit from such rewards, LPs must use effective liquidity provisioning strategies. However, LPs lack guidance for developing such strategies, which often leads them to financial losses. We developed a measurement model based on impermanent loss to analy

Thanos Drossos, Daniel Kirste, Niclas Kannengießer, Ali Sunyaev
arXiv · arXiv q-fin · 2025

Bootstrapping Liquidity in BTC-Denominated Prediction Markets

Prediction markets have gained adoption as on-chain mechanisms for aggregating information, with platforms such as Polymarket demonstrating demand for stablecoin-denominated markets. However, denominating in non-interest-bearing stablecoins introduces inefficiencies: participants face opportunity costs relative to the fiat risk-free rate, and Bitcoin holders in particular lose exposure to BTC appreciation when conver

Fedor Shabashev
arXiv · arXiv q-fin · 2023

Decentralised Finance and Automated Market Making: Predictable Loss and Optimal Liquidity Provision

Constant product markets with concentrated liquidity (CL) are the most popular type of automated market makers. In this paper, we characterise the continuous-time wealth dynamics of strategic LPs who dynamically adjust their range of liquidity provision in CL pools. Their wealth results from fee income, the value of their holdings in the pool, and rebalancing costs. Next, we derive a self-financing and closed-form op

Álvaro Cartea, Fayçal Drissi, Marcello Monga
arXiv · arXiv q-fin · 2022

Liquidity Provision Payoff on Automated Market Makers

The standard approach for compensating liquidity providers on many decentralized exchanges (DEX) for serving as counter-party to swaps is through charging a small percentage of fees. The expected payoff from the cash flow of this mode of market making has yet to be mathematically formulated in terms of volatility in the existing literature. We provide here a preliminary derivation of the payoff formula, by making the

Jin Hong Kuan
arXiv · arXiv q-fin · 2022

Delta Hedging Liquidity Positions on Automated Market Makers

Liquidity Providers on Automated Market Makers generate millions of USD in transaction fees daily. However, the net value of a Liquidity Position is vulnerable to price changes in the underlying assets in the pool. The dominant measure of loss in a Liquidity Position is Impermanent Loss. Impermanent Loss for Constant Function Market Makers has been widely studied. We propose a new metric to measure Liquidity Position

Adam Khakhar, Xi Chen
arXiv · arXiv q-fin · 2021

Concentrated Liquidity in Automated Market Makers

We examine how the introduction of concentrated liquidity has changed the liquidity provision market in automated market makers such as Uniswap. To this end, we compare average liquidity provider returns from trading fees before and after its introduction. Furthermore, we quantify the performance of a number of fundamental concentrated liquidity strategies using historical trade data. We estimate their possible retur

Robin Fritsch
arXiv · arXiv q-fin · 2015

Mathematical Foundations of Realtime Equity Trading. Liquidity Deficit and Market Dynamics. Automated Trading Machines

We postulates, and then show experimentally, that liquidity deficit is the driving force of the markets. In the first part of the paper a kinematic of liquidity deficit is developed. The calculus-like approach, which is based on Radon--Nikodym derivatives and their generalization, allows us to calculate important characteristics of observable market dynamics. In the second part of the paper this calculus is used in a

Vladislav Gennadievich Malyshkin, Ray Bakhramov
arXiv · arXiv q-fin · 2010

Automated Liquidity Provision and the Demise of Traditional Market Making

Traditional market makers are losing their importance as automated systems have largely assumed the role of liquidity provision in markets. We update the model of Glosten and Milgrom (1985) to analyze this new world: we add multiple securities and introduce an automated market maker who uses the relationships between securities to price order flow. This new automated participant transacts the majority of orders, sets

Austin Gerig, David Michayluk
arXiv · arXiv q-fin · 2025

Deep Reinforcement Learning for Automated Stock Trading: An Ensemble Strategy

Stock trading strategies play a critical role in investment. However, it is challenging to design a profitable strategy in a complex and dynamic stock market. In this paper, we propose an ensemble strategy that employs deep reinforcement schemes to learn a stock trading strategy by maximizing investment return. We train a deep reinforcement learning agent and obtain an ensemble trading strategy using three actor-crit

Hongyang Yang, Xiao-Yang Liu, Shan Zhong, Anwar Walid
arXiv · arXiv q-fin · 2024

Automated Market Making and Decentralized Finance

Automated market makers (AMMs) are a new type of trading venues which are revolutionising the way market participants interact. At present, the majority of AMMs are constant function market makers (CFMMs) where a deterministic trading function determines how markets are cleared. Within CFMMs, we focus on constant product market makers (CPMMs) which implements the concentrated liquidity (CL) feature. In this thesis we

Marcello Monga
arXiv · arXiv q-fin · 2023

Decentralised Finance and Automated Market Making: Execution and Speculation

Automated market makers (AMMs) are a new prototype of decentralised exchanges which are revolutionising market interactions. The majority of AMMs are constant product markets (CPMs) where exchange rates are set by a trading function. This work studies optimal trading and statistical arbitrage in CPMs where balancing exchange rate risk and execution costs is key. Empirical evidence shows that execution costs are accur

Álvaro Cartea, Fayçal Drissi, Marcello Monga
arXiv · arXiv q-fin · 2021

FinRL: Deep Reinforcement Learning Framework to Automate Trading in Quantitative Finance

Deep reinforcement learning (DRL) has been envisioned to have a competitive edge in quantitative finance. However, there is a steep development curve for quantitative traders to obtain an agent that automatically positions to win in the market, namely \textit{to decide where to trade, at what price} and \textit{what quantity}, due to the error-prone programming and arduous debugging. In this paper, we present the fir

Xiao-Yang Liu, Hongyang Yang, Jiechao Gao, Christina Dan Wang
arXiv · arXiv q-fin · 2021

The Homogenous Properties of Automated Market Makers

Automated market makers (AMM) have grown to obtain significant market share within the cryptocurrency ecosystem, resulting in a proliferation of new products pursuing exotic strategies for horizontal differentiation. Yet, their theoretical properties are curiously homogeneous when a set of basic assumptions are met. In this paper, we start by presenting a universal approach to deriving a formula for liquidity provisi

Johannes Rude Jensen, Mohsen Pourpouneh, Kurt Nielsen, Omri Ross
arXiv · arXiv q-fin · 2020

FinRL: A Deep Reinforcement Learning Library for Automated Stock Trading in Quantitative Finance

As deep reinforcement learning (DRL) has been recognized as an effective approach in quantitative finance, getting hands-on experiences is attractive to beginners. However, to train a practical DRL trading agent that decides where to trade, at what price, and what quantity involves error-prone and arduous development and debugging. In this paper, we introduce a DRL library FinRL that facilitates beginners to expose t

Xiao-Yang Liu, Hongyang Yang, Qian Chen, Runjia Zhang, Liuqing Yang
arXiv · arXiv q-fin · 2005

Automated Trading Systems: Developed and Emerging Capital Markets

Automated trading systems on developed and emerging capital markets are studied in this paper. The standard for developed market is automated trading system with 40-days simple moving average. We tested it for the index SIX Industrial for 1000 and 730 trading days of the slovak emerging capital market. The Buy and Hold trading system was 7.80 times more profitable than this etalon trading system for active trading. T

Ondrej Hudak, Jana Tothova
Wiki Entities · 1
Option Blackboard · 0
No Option Blackboard entries matched.
Encyclopedia · 0
No encyclopedia foundations matched.
Cards · 0
No cards matched.
← Back to Codex