Search

Search

Papers, wiki, Option Blackboard, encyclopedia, and cards.

Results for “counterparty” · papers 18 · wiki 3
Academic Papers · 18arXiv q-fin live 8 · desk corpus 43
arXiv · arXiv q-fin · 2009

Credit Default Swap Calibration and Equity Swap Valuation under Counterparty Risk with a Tractable Structural Model

In this paper we develop a tractable structural model with analytical default probabilities depending on some dynamics parameters, and we show how to calibrate the model using a chosen number of Credit Default Swap (CDS) market quotes. We essentially show how to use structural models with a calibration capability that is typical of the much more tractable credit-spread based intensity models. We apply the structural

Damiano Brigo, Marco Tarenghi
arXiv · arXiv q-fin · 2009

Credit Default Swap Calibration and Counterparty Risk Valuation with a Scenario based First Passage Model

In this work we develop a tractable structural model with analytical default probabilities depending on a random default barrier and possibly random volatility ideally associated with a scenario based underlying firm debt. We show how to calibrate this model using a chosen number of reference Credit Default Swap (CDS) market quotes. In general this model can be seen as a possible extension of the time-varying AT1P mo

Damiano Brigo, Marco Tarenghi
arXiv · arXiv q-fin · 2009

Credit Calibration with Structural Models: The Lehman case and Equity Swaps under Counterparty Risk

In this paper we develop structural first passage models (AT1P and SBTV) with time-varying volatility and characterized by high tractability, moving from the original work of Brigo and Tarenghi (2004, 2005) [19] [20] and Brigo and Morini (2006)[15]. The models can be calibrated exactly to credit spreads using efficient closed-form formulas for default probabilities. Default events are caused by the value of the firm

Damiano Brigo, Massimo Morini, Marco Tarenghi
arXiv · arXiv q-fin · 2024

Neural Networks for Portfolio-Level Risk Management: Portfolio Compression, Static Hedging, Counterparty Credit Risk Exposures and Impact on Capital Requirement

In this paper, we present an artificial neural network framework for portfolio compression of a large portfolio of European options with varying maturities (target portfolio) by a significantly smaller portfolio of European options with shorter or same maturity (compressed portfolio), which also represents a self-replicating static hedge portfolio of the target portfolio. For the proposed machine learning architectur

Vikranth Lokeshwar Dhandapani, Shashi Jain
arXiv · arXiv q-fin · 2017

Counterparty Credit Limits: The Impact of a Risk-Mitigation Measure on Everyday Trading

A counterparty credit limit (CCL) is a limit that is imposed by a financial institution to cap its maximum possible exposure to a specified counterparty. CCLs help institutions to mitigate counterparty credit risk via selective diversification of their exposures. In this paper, we analyze how CCLs impact the prices that institutions pay for their trades during everyday trading. We study a high-quality data set from a

Martin D. Gould, Nikolaus Hautsch, Sam D. Howison, Mason A. Porter
arXiv · arXiv q-fin · 2015

Wrong-Way Bounds in Counterparty Credit Risk Management

We study the problem of finding the worst-case joint distribution of a set of risk factors given prescribed multivariate marginals and a nonlinear loss function. We show that when the risk measure is CVaR, and the distributions are discretized, the problem can be conveniently solved using linear programming technique. The method has applications to any situation where marginals are provided, and bounds need to be det

Amir Memartoluie, David Saunders, Tony Wirjanto
arXiv · arXiv q-fin · 2015

Network Structure and Counterparty Credit Risk

In this paper we offer a novel type of network model which can capture the precise structure of a financial market based, for example, on empirical findings. With the attached stochastic framework it is further possible to study how an arbitrary network structure and its expected counterparty credit risk are analytically related to each other. This allows us, for the first time, to model the precise structure of an a

Alexander von Felbert
arXiv · arXiv · 2011

Counterparty Risk FAQ: Credit VaR, PFE, CVA, DVA, Closeout, Netting, Collateral, Re-hypothecation, WWR, Basel, Funding, CCDS and Margin Lending

We present a dialogue on Counterparty Credit Risk touching on Credit Value at Risk (Credit VaR), Potential Future Exposure (PFE), Expected Exposure (EE), Expected Positive Exposure (EPE), Credit Valuation Adjustment (CVA), Debit Valuation Adjustment (DVA), DVA Hedging, Closeout conventions, Netting clauses, Collateral modeling, Gap Risk, Re-hypothecation, Wrong Way Risk, Basel III, inclusion of Funding costs, First t

Damiano Brigo
arXiv · arXiv · 2008

Bilateral counterparty risk valuation with stochastic dynamical models and application to Credit Default Swaps

We introduce the general arbitrage-free valuation framework for counterparty risk adjustments in presence of bilateral default risk, including default of the investor. We illustrate the symmetry in the valuation and show that the adjustment involves a long position in a put option plus a short position in a call option, both with zero strike and written on the residual net value of the contract at the relevant defaul

Damiano Brigo, Agostino Capponi
arXiv · arXiv · 2026

TradeMech: A Method to Multilaterally Net Trades Without Altering Counterparty Exposure

Financial markets such as bond, derivatives, and repo markets form networks of interdependent obligations. Existing multilateral netting methods typically trade off the extent of netting against preservation of counterparty exposure: central clearing reallocates exposure to a central counterparty, while trade compression may alter bilateral counterparty relationships. TradeMech is a mechanism for markets in which one

Daniel Aronoff, Robert M. Townsend, Madars Virza
arXiv · arXiv · 2012

Counterparty Risk and Funding: The Four Wings of the TVA

The credit crisis and the ongoing European sovereign debt crisis have highlighted the native form of credit risk, namely the counterparty risk. The related Credit Valuation Adjustment, (CVA), Debt Valuation Adjustment (DVA), Liquidity Valuation Adjustment (LVA) and Replacement Cost (RC) issues, jointly referred to in this paper as Total Valuation Adjustment (TVA), have been thoroughly investigated in the theoretical

Stéphane Crépey, Rémi Gerboud, Zorana Grbac, Nathalie Ngor
arXiv · arXiv · 2011

Collateral Margining in Arbitrage-Free Counterparty Valuation Adjustment including Re-Hypotecation and Netting

This paper generalizes the framework for arbitrage-free valuation of bilateral counterparty risk to the case where collateral is included, with possible re-hypotecation. We analyze how the payout of claims is modified when collateral margining is included in agreement with current ISDA documentation. We then specialize our analysis to interest-rate swaps as underlying portfolio, and allow for mutual dependences betwe

Damiano Brigo, Agostino Capponi, Andrea Pallavicini, Vasileios Papatheodorou
arXiv · arXiv · 2009

Bilateral counterparty risk valuation for interest-rate products: impact of volatilities and correlations

The purpose of this paper is introducing rigorous methods and formulas for bilateral counterparty risk credit valuation adjustments (CVA's) on interest-rate portfolios. In doing so, we summarize the general arbitrage-free valuation framework for counterparty risk adjustments in presence of bilateral default risk, as developed more in detail in Brigo and Capponi (2008), including the default of the investor. We illust

Damiano Brigo, Andrea Pallavicini, Vasileios Papatheodorou
arXiv · arXiv · 2009

Counterparty risk valuation for Energy-Commodities swaps: Impact of volatilities and correlation

It is commonly accepted that Commodities futures and forward prices, in principle, agree under some simplifying assumptions. One of the most relevant assumptions is the absence of counterparty risk. Indeed, due to margining, futures have practically no counterparty risk. Forwards, instead, may bear the full risk of default for the counterparty when traded with brokers or outside clearing houses, or when embedded in o

Damiano Brigo, Kyriakos Chourdakis, Imane Bakkar
arXiv · arXiv · 2019

Distributionally Robust XVA via Wasserstein Distance: Wrong Way Counterparty Credit and Funding Risk

This paper investigates calculations of robust XVA, in particular, credit valuation adjustment (CVA) and funding valuation adjustment (FVA) for over-the-counter derivatives under distributional uncertainty using Wasserstein distance as the ambiguity measure. Wrong way counterparty credit risk and funding risk can be characterized (and indeed quantified) via the robust XVA formulations. The simpler dual formulations a

Derek Singh, Shuzhong Zhang
arXiv · arXiv · 2018

Pricing Financial Derivatives Subject to Counterparty Risk and Credit Value Adjustment

This article presents a generic model for pricing financial derivatives subject to counterparty credit risk. Both unilateral and bilateral types of credit risks are considered. Our study shows that credit risk should be modeled as American style options in most cases, which require a backward induction valuation. To correct a common mistake in the literature, we emphasize that the market value of a defaultable deriva

David Lee
arXiv · arXiv · 2014

The Credibility Theory applied to backtesting Counterparty Credit Risk

Credibility theory provides tools to obtain better estimates by combining individual data with sample information. We apply the Credibility theory to a Uniform distribution that is used in testing the reliability of forecasting an interest rate for long term horizons. Such empirical exercise is asked by Regulators (CRR, 2013) in validating an Internal Model Method for Counterparty Credit Risk. The main results is tha

Matteo Formenti
arXiv · arXiv · 2013

Restructuring the "one-way CSA" counterparty risk in a CDO

We show how to restructure the counterparty risk faced by the originator of a securitization or covered bond arising from an interest rate hedging swap assisted by a "one-way" collateral agreement. This risk emerges when the swap is negotiated between the special purpose vehicle and a third party that covers itself through a back-to-back swap with the originator. We show that the counterparty risk of the originator m

Lorenzo Giada, Claudio Nordio
Wiki Entities · 3
Option Blackboard · 0
No Option Blackboard entries matched.
Encyclopedia · 3
Cards · 0
No cards matched.
← Back to Codex