Search

Search

Papers, wiki, Option Blackboard, encyclopedia, and cards.

Results for “cross-section” · papers 18 · wiki 9
Academic Papers · 18arXiv q-fin live 8 · desk corpus 39
arXiv · arXiv q-fin · 2018

Cross-Sectional Variation of Intraday Liquidity, Cross-Impact, and their Effect on Portfolio Execution

The composition of natural liquidity has been changing over time. An analysis of intraday volumes for the S&P500 constituent stocks illustrates that (i) volume surprises, i.e., deviations from their respective forecasts, are correlated across stocks, and (ii) this correlation increases during the last few hours of the trading session. These observations could be attributed, in part, to the prevalence of portfolio tra

Seungki Min, Costis Maglaras, Ciamac C. Moallemi
arXiv · arXiv q-fin · 2023

Portfolio Volatility Estimation Relative to Stock Market Cross-Sectional Intrinsic Entropy

Selecting stock portfolios and assessing their relative volatility risk compared to the market as a whole, market indices, or other portfolios is of great importance to professional fund managers and individual investors alike. Our research uses the cross-sectional intrinsic entropy (CSIE) model to estimate the cross-sectional volatility of the stock groups that can be considered together as portfolio constituents. I

Claudiu Vinte, Marcel Ausloos
arXiv · arXiv q-fin · 2022

The Cross-Sectional Intrinsic Entropy. A Comprehensive Stock Market Volatility Estimator

To take into account the temporal dimension of uncertainty in stock markets, this paper introduces a cross-sectional estimation of stock market volatility based on the intrinsic entropy model. The proposed cross-sectional intrinsic entropy (CSIE) is defined and computed as a daily volatility estimate for the entire market, grounded on the daily traded prices: open, high, low, and close prices (OHLC), along with the d

Claudiu Vinte, Marcel Ausloos
arXiv · arXiv · 2014

Liquidity commonality does not imply liquidity resilience commonality: A functional characterisation for ultra-high frequency cross-sectional LOB data

We present a large-scale study of commonality in liquidity and resilience across assets in an ultra high-frequency (millisecond-timestamped) Limit Order Book (LOB) dataset from a pan-European electronic equity trading facility. We first show that extant work in quantifying liquidity commonality through the degree of explanatory power of the dominant modes of variation of liquidity (extracted through Principal Compone

Efstathios Panayi, Gareth Peters, Ioannis Kosmidis
arXiv · arXiv · 2017

Wax and wane of the cross-sectional momentum and contrarian effects: Evidence from the Chinese stock markets

This paper investigates the time-varying risk-premium relation of the Chinese stock markets within the framework of cross-sectional momentum and contrarian effects by adopting the Capital Asset Pricing Model and the French-Fama three factor model. The evolving arbitrage opportunities are also studied by quantifying the performance of time-varying cross-sectional momentum and contrarian effects in the Chinese stock ma

H. -L. Shi, W. -X. Zhou
arXiv · arXiv · 2026

Nyström Attention Matches Full Attention for Cross-Sectional Stock Prediction

MASTER's inter-stock multi-head attention -- the module responsible for modeling cross-sectional stock relationships -- accounts for 42.5% of model parameters and 25% of predictive value. We systematically decompose this module and uncover a surprising structure: the learned attention is near-uniform (perplexity 278/300), yet forcing exact uniformity eliminates all cross-sectional discrimination. Spectral analysis re

Kunhan Guo
arXiv · arXiv · 2026

Regime-Gated Residual Mixture-of-Experts for Cross-Sectional Volatility Forecasting

Financial volatility is regime dependent, yet incorporating regime information into neural networks can also destabilize training. This paper asks where such information should enter a neural cross-sectional volatility forecasting model. We study five-day realized-volatility forecasts for 1,027 U.S. equities using a rolling walk-forward evaluation framework in which information, model capacity, hyperparameter tuning,

Junyi Ye, Gargi Vijay Borde
arXiv · arXiv · 2026

Vector-Quantized Discrete Latent Factors Meet Financial Priors: Dynamic Cross-Sectional Stock Ranking Prediction for Portfolio Construction

Predicting cross-sectional stock returns is challenging due to low signal-to-noise ratios and evolving market regimes. Classical factor models offer interpretability but limited flexibility, while deep learning models achieve strong performance yet often underutilize financial priors. We address this gap with PRISM-VQ (PRior-Informed Stock Model with Vector Quantization), a dynamic factor framework that integrates ex

Namhyoung Kim, Jae Wook Song
arXiv · arXiv · 2024

Isotropic Correlation Models for the Cross-Section of Equity Returns

This note discusses some of the aspects of a model for the covariance of equity returns based on a simple "isotropic" structure in which all pairwise correlations are taken to be the same value. The effect of the structure on feasible values for the common correlation of returns and on the "effective degrees of freedom" within the equity cross-section are discussed, as well as the impact of this constraint on the asy

Graham L. Giller
arXiv · arXiv · 2022

Transfer Ranking in Finance: Applications to Cross-Sectional Momentum with Data Scarcity

Cross-sectional strategies are a classical and popular trading style, with recent high performing variants incorporating sophisticated neural architectures. While these strategies have been applied successfully to data-rich settings involving mature assets with long histories, deploying them on instruments with limited samples generally produce over-fitted models with degraded performance. In this paper, we introduce

Daniel Poh, Stephen Roberts, Stefan Zohren
arXiv · arXiv · 2020

Building Cross-Sectional Systematic Strategies By Learning to Rank

The success of a cross-sectional systematic strategy depends critically on accurately ranking assets prior to portfolio construction. Contemporary techniques perform this ranking step either with simple heuristics or by sorting outputs from standard regression or classification models, which have been demonstrated to be sub-optimal for ranking in other domains (e.g. information retrieval). To address this deficiency,

Daniel Poh, Bryan Lim, Stefan Zohren, Stephen Roberts
arXiv · arXiv · 2019

Sustainable Investing and the Cross-Section of Returns and Maximum Drawdown

We use supervised learning to identify factors that predict the cross-section of returns and maximum drawdown for stocks in the US equity market. Our data run from January 1970 to December 2019 and our analysis includes ordinary least squares, penalized linear regressions, tree-based models, and neural networks. We find that the most important predictors tended to be consistent across models, and that non-linear mode

Lisa R. Goldberg, Saad Mouti
arXiv · arXiv q-fin · 2025

Machine Learning Enhanced Multi-Factor Quantitative Trading: A Cross-Sectional Portfolio Optimization Approach with Bias Correction

Rolling-window factor pipelines for Chinese A-share markets contain a subtle but costly flaw: daily price-move limits (+/-10% main-board, +/-20% STAR/ChiNext) render a fraction of closing prices non-executable, yet standard implementations ingest these values before any row-filtering runs. The contaminated aggregates propagate silently through moving averages, correlations, and ranks--a failure mode we term "upstream

Yimin Du
arXiv · arXiv q-fin · 2025

Do Mutual Funds Make Active and Skilled Liquidity Choices in Portfolio Management? Evidence from India

This study examines active liquidity management by Indian open-ended equity mutual funds. We find that fund managers respond to inflows by increasing cash holdings, which are later used to purchase less-liquid stocks at favourable valuations. Funds with less liquid portfolios tend to maintain larger cash reserves to manage flows. Funds that make active liquidity choices yield statistically and economically significan

Pankaj K Agarwal, H K Pradhan, Konark Saxena
arXiv · arXiv q-fin · 2016

Market Microstructure During Financial Crisis: Dynamics of Informed and Heuristic-Driven Trading

We implement a market microstructure model including informed, uninformed and heuristic-driven investors, which latter behave in line with loss-aversion and mental accounting. We show that the probability of informed trading (PIN) varies significantly during 2008. In contrast, the probability of heuristic-driven trading (PH) remains constant both before and after the collapse of Lehman Brothers. Cross-sectional analy

Mihaly Ormos, Dusan Timotity
arXiv · arXiv q-fin · 2025

Time-Varying Factor-Augmented Models for Volatility Forecasting

Accurate volatility forecasts are vital in modern finance for risk management, portfolio allocation, and strategic decision-making. However, existing methods face key limitations. Fully multivariate models, while comprehensive, are computationally infeasible for realistic portfolios. Factor models, though efficient, primarily use static factor loadings, failing to capture evolving volatility co-movements when they ar

Duo Zhang, Jiayu Li, Junyi Mo, Elynn Chen
arXiv · arXiv q-fin · 2018

The Power of Trading Polarity: Evidence from China Stock Market Crash

The imbalance of buying and selling functions profoundly in the formation of market trends, however, a fine-granularity investigation of the imbalance is still missing. This paper investigates a unique transaction dataset that enables us to inspect the imbalance of buying and selling on the man-times level at high frequency, what we call 'trading polarity', for a large cross-section of stocks from Shenzhen Stock Exch

Shan Lu, Jichang Zhao, Huiwen Wang
arXiv · arXiv · 2026

Which Voices Move Markets? Speaker Identity and the Cross-Section of Post-Earnings Returns

We utilize FinBERT, a domain-specific transformer model, to parse 6.5 million sentences from 16,428 S&P 500 quarterly earnings call transcripts (2015-2025) and demonstrate that post-earnings stock returns are not equally affected by all speakers in a conference call. Our section-weighted sentiment, with empirically derived speaker weights (Analyst 49%, CFO 30%, Executive 16%, Other 5%), achieves an out-of-sample Spea

Karmanpartap Singh Sidhu, Junyi Fan, Maryam Pishgar
Wiki Entities · 9
Option Blackboard · 0
No Option Blackboard entries matched.
Encyclopedia · 9
Strategies · Foundations

12-Month Cycle in the Cross-Section of Stock Returns

Use same-calendar-month returns in prior years as a cross-sectional signal — annual seasonality in the stock sort.

CTA · Foundations

Cross-Sectional Futures Momentum

Rank futures on trailing return and hold winners vs losers — relative momentum inside a CTA universe, not each market’s own sign.

Strategies · Foundations

Currency Momentum Strategy

Long currencies that appreciated over the lookback, short those that depreciated — cross-sectional FX momentum.

Quant · Foundations

Fama-French Three-Factor Model

The three-factor model adds size (SMB) and value (HML) to the market — a better cross-section than CAPM, still not the last word.

Strategies · Foundations

Lexical Density of Company Filings

Score filings on information density (less boilerplate, more content words) and sort the cross-section on that score.

Strategies · Foundations

Momentum Effect in Commodities

Long commodity futures with the strongest trailing returns and short the weakest — cross-sectional commodity momentum.

Strategies · Foundations

Momentum Factor Effect in Stocks

Long 12-1 month winners and short losers in a stock universe — the cross-sectional equity momentum recipe.

Strategies · Foundations

Short Interest Effect — Long-Short

Short high short-interest names and long low short-interest names — crowding and borrow as a cross-sectional signal.

Strategies · Foundations

Time-Series Momentum Effect

In each futures market, go long if that market’s own trailing return is positive and short if negative — TSMOM, not cross-sectional rank.

Cards · 0
No cards matched.
← Back to Codex