arXiv · arXiv q-fin · 2012
We derive explicit recursive formulas for Target Close (TC) and Implementation Shortfall (IS) in the Almgren-Chriss framework. We explain how to compute the optimal starting and stopping times for IS and TC, respectively, given a minimum trading size. We also show how to add a minimum participation rate constraint (Percentage of Volume, PVol) for both TC and IS. We also study an alternative set of risk measures for t…
Mauricio Labadie, Charles-Albert Lehalle
arXiv · arXiv q-fin · 2020
We propose a static equilibrium model for limit order book where profit-maximizing investors receive an information signal regarding the liquidation value of the asset and execute via a competitive dealer with random initial inventory, who trades against a competitive limit order book populated by liquidity suppliers. We show that an equilibrium exists for bounded signal distributions, obtain closed form solutions fo…
Umut Çetin, Henri Waelbroeck
arXiv · arXiv q-fin · 2014
Reinforcement learning is explored as a candidate machine learning technique to enhance existing analytical solutions for optimal trade execution with elements from the market microstructure. Given a volume-to-trade, fixed time horizon and discrete trading periods, the aim is to adapt a given volume trajectory such that it is dynamic with respect to favourable/unfavourable conditions during realtime execution, thereb…
Dieter Hendricks, Diane Wilcox
arXiv · arXiv q-fin · 2012
When executing their orders, investors are proposed different strategies by brokers and investment banks. Most orders are executed using VWAP algorithms. Other basic execution strategies include POV (also called PVol) -- for percentage of volume --, IS -- implementation shortfall -- or Target Close. In this article dedicated to POV strategies, we develop a liquidation model in which a trader is constrained to liquida…
Olivier Guéant
arXiv · arXiv q-fin · 2022
We consider a liquidation problem in which a risk-averse trader tries to liquidate a fixed quantity of an asset in the presence of market impact and random price fluctuations. The trader encounters a trade-off between the transaction costs incurred due to market impact and the volatility risk of holding the position. Our formulation begins with a continuous-time and infinite horizon variation of the seminal model of …
Seungki Min, Ciamac C. Moallemi, Costis Maglaras
arXiv · arXiv q-fin · 2019
We present a formulation of the transaction cost analysis (TCA) in the Bayesian framework for the primary purpose of comparing broker algorithms using standardized benchmarks. Our formulation allows effective calculation of the expected value of trading benchmarks with only a finite sample of data relevant to practical applications. We discuss the nature of distribution of implementation shortfall, volume-weighted av…
Vladimir Markov
arXiv · arXiv q-fin · 2019
We solve the problem of optimal liquidation with volume weighted average price (VWAP) benchmark when the market impact is linear and transient. Our setting is indeed more general as it considers the case when the trading interval is not necessarily coincident with the benchmark interval: Implementation Shortfall and Target Close execution are shown to be particular cases of our setting. We find explicit solutions in …
Alexander Barzykin, Fabrizio Lillo
arXiv · arXiv q-fin · 2016
In this short note, we study an optimization problem of expected implementation shortfall (IS) cost under general shaped market impact functions. In particular, we find that an optimal strategy is a VWAP (volume weighted average price) execution strategy when the market model is a Black-Scholes type with stochastic clock and market trading volume is large.
Takashi Kato
arXiv · arXiv · 2026
Automated execution algorithms are organized into schedule-based and liquidity-seeking families. This paper concerns the first, whose members -- Time-Weighted Average Price (TWAP), Volume-Weighted Average Price (VWAP), Percentage of Volume (POV) and Implementation Shortfall -- are all model-based: each derives its decisions from an explicit model, forecast, schedule or control rule. We introduce Shadow-PPOV, a passiv…
Vincent Maciejewski
arXiv · arXiv · 2026
Price-level limit order book (L2) data reveal aggregate liquidity but not the ordered queue required by price--time priority. Passive-execution backtests can therefore depend on an unobserved cancellation-allocation rule even when observed prices, quantities, and trades are held fixed. We frame recovery of market-by-order histories from aggregate snapshots as a conditional partial identification problem: multiple his…
Riya Danait, Yuliana Zamora, Ioana Boier
arXiv · arXiv · 2026
Trader-facing dynamic fees are increasingly proposed for automated market makers (AMMs), but historical data do not identify how order flow would respond: trader-facing fees do not vary, trader types are latent, and a replayed tape is not a sequential decision environment. We therefore construct a minimal closed-loop simulator in which the missing signal exists by construction: two constant-product pools repriced by …
Wen-Ting Wang
arXiv · arXiv · 2024
Bertsimas and Lo's seminal work laid the groundwork for addressing the implementation shortfall dilemma in institutional investing, emphasizing the significance of market microstructure and price dynamics in minimizing execution costs. However, the ability to derive a theoretical Optimum market order policy is an unrealistic assumption for many investors. This study aims to bridge this gap by proposing an approach th…
Simeon Kolev
arXiv · arXiv · 2026
This study addresses the optimal execution of large stock sell programs by introducing TT-DAC-PS (Twin-Target Deterministic Actor-Critic with Policy Smoothing), a deterministic actor-critic architecture that combines twin exponential-moving-average critic targets with pessimistic min backup, TD3-style target policy smoothing noise, delayed actor updates, and conservative Q regularisation to curb overestimation. Explo…
Ilia Zaznov, Atta Badii, Julian Kunkel, Alfonso Dufour
arXiv · arXiv · 2021
This article is part of a comprehensive research project on liquidity risk in asset management, which can be divided into three dimensions. The first dimension covers the modeling of the liability liquidity risk (or funding liquidity), the second dimension is dedicated to the modeling of the asset liquidity risk (or market liquidity), whereas the third dimension considers the management of the asset-liability liquidi…
Thierry Roncalli
arXiv · arXiv · 2021
This article is part of a comprehensive research project on liquidity risk in asset management, which can be divided into three dimensions. The first dimension covers liability liquidity risk (or funding liquidity) modeling, the second dimension focuses on asset liquidity risk (or market liquidity) modeling, and the third dimension considers the asset-liability management of the liquidity gap risk (or asset-liability…
Thierry Roncalli, Amina Cherief, Fatma Karray-Meziou, Margaux Regnault
arXiv · arXiv · 2026
We study cash-flow forecasting for derivatives used in liquidity management and clarify its relation to risk-neutral valuation and replication. While it is well known that expectations under different measures (e.g., $\mathbb{P}$ vs. $\mathbb{Q}$) can yield different undiscounted cash-flows, further inconsistencies arise when payment times are stochastic. We show that using discounting sensitivities (funding-curve he…
Christian P. Fries
arXiv · arXiv · 2026
We introduce $\textbf{Slippage-at-Risk (SaR)}$, a quantitative framework for measuring liquidity risk in perpetual futures exchanges. Unlike backward-looking metrics such as Value-at-Risk computed on historical returns or realized deficit distributions, SaR provides a \emph{forward-looking} assessment of liquidation execution risk derived from current order book microstructure. The framework comprises three complemen…
Otar Sepper
arXiv · arXiv · 2025
We develop a rigorous walk-forward validation framework for algorithmic trading designed to mitigate overfitting and lookahead bias. Our methodology combines interpretable hypothesis-driven signal generation with reinforcement learning and strict out-of-sample testing. The framework enforces strict information set discipline, employs rolling window validation across 34 independent test periods, maintains complete int…
Gagan Deep, Akash Deep, William Lamptey